<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Grind &#187; firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simond.net/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simond.net</link>
	<description>Wonderings, wanderings and waffle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Firefox Beta 3 4</title>
		<link>http://www.simond.net/2008/03/14/latest-firefox-beta-3-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simond.net/2008/03/14/latest-firefox-beta-3-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simond.net/2008/03/14/latest-firefox-beta-3-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been playing about with the latest beta of Firefox. Not sure I like the RSS links &#8211; I&#8217;m used to the way Safari puts numbers against bookmark items. It also seems really slow at downloading images, compared to Safari (yes &#8230; <a href="http://www.simond.net/2008/03/14/latest-firefox-beta-3-4/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been playing about with the latest beta of Firefox. Not sure I like the RSS links &#8211; I&#8217;m used to the way Safari puts numbers against bookmark items. It also seems really slow at downloading images, compared to Safari (yes I have cleared caches, to provide a comparative test). AdBlock plugin for Firefox is really good, better than the <a href="http://safariadblock.sourceforge.net/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/safariadblock.sourceforge.net/?referer=');">open source</a> one for Safari.</p>
<p>Just waiting for Safari 3 to come out now, not that bothered with Acid test compliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simond.net/2008/03/14/latest-firefox-beta-3-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

